| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tuesday, January 21, 2014
Vocab 1-B
Here are some more definitions. These terms will be seen some in the future, and not just within these pages.
Sunday, January 19, 2014
Vocab 1-A
Some terms defined:
|
a posteriori -- derived from or requiring evidence for its validation or support; empirical; open to revision
a priori –of logic relating to or involving deductive reasoning from a general principle to the expected acts or effects: logic known to be true independently of or in advance of experience of the subject matter; requiring no evidence for its validation or support
abstract -- thought of apart from concrete realities, specific objects, or actual instances: an abstract idea; expressing a quality or characteristic apart from any specific object or instance, as justice, poverty, and speed; theoretical; not applied or practical: abstract science; difficult to understand; abstruse: abstract speculations.
absurd -- utterly or obviously senseless, illogical, or untrue; contrary to all reason or common sense; laughably foolish or false: an absurd explanation.
ad hoc -- concerned or dealing with a specific subject, purpose, or end: for the special purpose or end presently under consideration.
ad hominem -- appealing to one's preju-dices, emotions, or special interests rather than to one's intellect or reason; attacking an opponent's character rather than answering his argument.
ad infinitum -- without end; endlessly; to infinity.
| |||||||||
| |||||||||
| |||||||||
Vocabulary
As we look at the world of philosophy, we will encounter some terms that seem strange. Some we know, some will have new definitions, some will be strange indeed.
The following list will be defined over the next few weeks. As more topics are explored, the list will grow.
The following list will be defined over the next few weeks. As more topics are explored, the list will grow.
| a posteriori | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| a priori | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| abstract | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| absurd | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ad hoc | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ad hominem | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ad infinitum | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| agnosticism | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| annihilate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| apodictic | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| apologetics | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sunday, January 5, 2014
Why philosophy?
We look to philosophy to us with some everyday problems
or questions, and with some challenges faced in the not so common day to day
activities. As these words are being
read, no doubt the question comes to mind as to what some of these might be?
All of us have beliefs that are not open to much
challenge, and then there are those which are wide open to challenge and
questioning. One such value that may be
posed is the existence of God. There are
some who do not believe in anything supernatural, and will not be changed no
matter what evidence is presented.
Genuine miracle will have little chance of changing the opinion. Receiving such miracle may not occur form
refusal to believe. If miracle does
happen, this person may change his/her mind.
Once the question of God has been decided, the question
of who is Jesus Christ may arise.
The "miracle" above may help in this decision, but there may be other
lingering issues, such as who He really is, what He really did, what about this
Easter experience, and more.
The above illustrations suggest theological questions,
but philosophy helps in going “lower” in the decision making process, this
falls into the reasons of “Can I believe?” and “How do I prove this belief?”
Going further, apologetics, which is the defense of the
Christian faith makes use of philosophical processes. Polemics defend the faith form attacks
outside of the faith. These may seem
unneeded to the average believer, which may seem true until one reads in the
Bible that we are to ready to provide an answer to the faith that is within us.
Again the above examples indicate that theology uses the
tools and methods of philosophy. Without
realizing it, everybody uses some of these tools and processes every day. With some practice, these skills can be
better refined.
Be warned, many will not change cherished beliefs, but
those who are most secure in their value system are open to discussion. Discussion may not change the mind, but, will
share important seeds of truth.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)